Cannabidiol for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and Dravet syndrome: experts' recommendations for its use in clinical practice in Spain. / Cannabidiol para el tratamiento del síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut y del síndrome de Dravet: recomendaciones de expertos sobre su uso en la práctica clínica en España.

INTRODUCTION: Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of the main components of the cannabis plant that has demonstrated anti-epileptic seizure effect. Following its clinical development, in September 2019 the European Medicines Agency approved its indication for the adjunctive therapy of epileptic seizures associated with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) and Dravet syndrome (DS), combined with clobazam (CLB), in patients of 2 years of age and older. AIM: To establish recommendations on the use of plant-derived highly purified CBD on which Spanish experts have reached consensus for the treatment of epilepsy in patients with DS and LGS based on their clinical experience and the scientific evidence. DEVELOPMENT: Consensus meeting with the participation of four Spanish neurologists and neuropediatric who are experts in epilepsy secondary to DS and LGS and with clinical experience in the use and management of CBD. They discussed on several topics, including posology (starting dose, dose escalation schema), efficacy (assessment of outcomes and indications for treatment withdrawal), and safety (evaluation, drug-drug interactions, adverse events management). CONCLUSIONS: In order to optimise CBD treatment, a slow dose escalation (= 4 weeks) is recommended until the maximum recommended dose or the desire effect is reached. It is also recommended that the concomitant antiseizure medications (ASMs) be reduced in case of adverse events due to interactions, and that the treatment continues for at least 6 months if it is well tolerated. The efficacy and safety of CBD must be assessed individually, considering the benefits and risks for individual patients.

TITLE: Cannabidiol para el tratamiento del síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut y del síndrome de Dravet: recomendaciones de expertos sobre su uso en la práctica clínica en España.Introducción. El cannabidiol (CBD) es uno de los componentes principales de la planta del cannabis que ha demostrado efecto ante las crisis epilépticas. Tras su desarrollo clínico, obtuvo su aprobación por la Agencia Europea del Medicamento en septiembre de 2019 para el tratamiento de las crisis epilépticas asociadas con el síndrome de Lennox-Gastaut (SLG) y el síndrome de Dravet (SD), en combinación con el clobazam (CLB), en pacientes a partir de los dos años. Objetivo. Establecer unas recomendaciones de manejo del CBD derivado de la planta altamente purificado consensuadas por expertos españoles en el tratamiento de la epilepsia para su uso en pacientes con SD y SLG, basándose en su experiencia clínica y en la evidencia científica. Desarrollo. Reunión de consenso de un grupo de cuatro neurólogos y neuropediatras españoles expertos en el manejo de la epilepsia asociada al SD y el SLG y con experiencia clínica en el uso de CBD. Se debatió sobre diferentes áreas, incluyendo la posología (dosis de inicio, pauta de escalada), la eficacia (valoración de resultados e indicaciones para la suspensión del tratamiento) y la seguridad (evaluación, interacciones entre fármacos, manejo de efectos adversos). Conclusiones. Para optimizar el tratamiento con CBD, se recomienda una pauta lenta de escalada de dosis (de cuatro semanas o más) hasta alcanzar la dosis máxima recomendada o el efecto deseado, reducir los fármacos anticrisis epilépticas concomitantes si aparecen efectos adversos por interacciones y mantener el tratamiento al menos seis meses si se tolera. La eficacia y la seguridad del CBD deben evaluarse de forma individual, considerando el beneficio y el riesgo para cada paciente.

Epilepsia resistente a fármacos. Concepto y alternativas terapéuticas / Drug-resistant epilepsy: Definition and treatment alternatives

Introducción: El dolor es un síntoma muy frecuente en los pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré, con una intensidad de moderada a severa en la mayoría de los casos; puede persistir luego de la resolución de la enfermedad. Objetivo: Identificar la terapia analgésica más apropiada para el manejo del dolor en los pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré. Material y métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda y selección sistemática de los artículos científicos sobre el tratamiento del dolor en pacientes con síndrome de Guillain-Barré publicados entre enero de 1985 y diciembre de 2012. Se incluyeron solo ensayos clínicos aleatorizados, doble ciego, que evaluaron el efecto de los medicamentos en el tratamiento del dolor en estos pacientes. Resultados: Cuatro artículos cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Uno evaluó el uso de gabapentina, otro, el de carbamazepina, otro comparó el uso de gabapentina y carbamazepina, y el último evaluó el uso de metilprednisolona. Tanto carbamazepina como gabapentina fueron útiles en el manejo del dolor. En el estudio que comparó carbamazepina y gabapentina, los pacientes presentaron menor intensidad del dolor con el uso de este último. La metilprednisolona no mostró un efecto positivo en la reducción del dolor. Los datos publicados no permitieron la realización de un metaanálisis. Conclusiones: No hay evidencia sólida en el momento actual para recomendar una opción terapéutica específica ante este problema. Es necesaria la realización de futuros estudios clínicos que incluyan un mayor número de pacientes, por un tiempo más prolongado, que individualicen los tipos de dolor por pacientes y midan objetivamente la intensidad de este

Introduction: Pain is a common symptom in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Intensity is moderate to severe in most cases and pain may persist after resolution of the disease. Objective: Identify the most appropriate analgesic therapy for pain management in patients with Guillain-Barre syndrome. Material and methods: Systematic review and selection of scientific articles on treatment of pain in Guillain-Barre syndrome patients, published between January 1985 and December 2012. We included only randomised, double-blind, controlled trials assessing the effectiveness of drugs for pain management in these patients. Results: Four articles met the inclusion criteria. One evaluated the use of gabapentin, another evaluated carbamazepine, a third compared gabapentin to carbamazepine, and the last evaluated use of methylprednisolone. Both carbamazepine and gabapentin were useful for pain management. Patients experienced lower-intensity pain with gabapentin treatment in the study comparing that drug to carbamazepine. Methylprednisolone was not shown to be effective for reducing pain. The published data did not permit completion of a meta-analysis. Conclusions: There is no robust evidence at present that would point to a single treatment option for this disorder. Further clinical studies of larger patient samples and with a longer duration are needed to characterise types of pain for each patient and measure pain intensity in an objective way

Drug-resistant epilepsy: definition and treatment alternatives.

INTRODUCTION: Drug-resistant epilepsy affects 25% of all epileptic patients, and quality of life decreases in these patients due to their seizures. Early detection is crucial in order to establish potential treatment alternatives and determine if the patient is a surgical candidate. DEVELOPMENT: PubMed search for articles, recommendations published by major medical societies, and clinical practice guidelines for drug-resistant epilepsy and its medical and surgical treatment options. Evidence and recommendations are classified according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2001) and the European Federation of Neurological Societies (2004) for therapeutic actions. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying patients with drug-resistant epilepsy is important for optimising drug therapy. Experts recommend rational polytherapy with antiepileptic drugs to find more effective combinations with fewer adverse effects. When adequate seizure control is not achieved, a presurgical evaluation in an epilepsy referral centre is recommended. These evaluations explore how to resect the epileptogenic zone without causing functional deficits in cases in which this is feasible. If resective surgery is not achievable, palliative surgery or neurostimulation systems (including vagus nerve, trigeminal nerve, or deep brain stimulation) may be an option. Other treatment alternatives such as ketogenic diet may also be considered in selected patients.

[Nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy]. / Neuropatía vasculítica no sistémica.

BACKGROUND: Nonsystemic vasculitic neuropathy (NSVN) is an infrequent type of vasculitic neuropathy that evolves without manifestations of vasculitis in other organs and in the absence of serological abnormalities. There are non clarified conjectures about the pathogenesis, outcome and treatment approach. PATIENTS AND METHOD: A retrospective study of a series of six patients diagnosed of NSVN during a period of 12 years. Clinical, electrophysiological and pathological features, as well as the response to therapy and outcome are analysed. RESULTS: Four cases presented with a pattern of multiple mononeuropathy, evolving towards a symmetrical sensory and motor polyneuropathy in two of them. One patient presented with an acute sensory neuropathy and another had a subacute asymmetric sensory and motor neuropathy. No signs of accompanying systemic vasculitis were observed during the follow-up (mean 35 months) and the only outstanding serological abnormality was the presence of antibodies against hepatitis B virus in four of them. The nerve conduction studies showed typical features of axonal degeneration. The diagnostic was obtained due to the presence of a necrotizing vasculitis in the sural nerve biopsy in all cases. The mean time from symptom onset to diagnosis was 11 months. All patients were treated with immunosuppressive therapy presenting a favourable response, except the case of the sensory neuropathy that remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: NSVN is a benign type of vasculitic neuropathy with a variable clinical pattern of presentation and favourable response to immunosuppression. This neuropathy requires a high index of suspicion for diagnosis, so nerve biopsy must be carried out in all neuropathy of unknown etiology. Careful follow-up of patients is necessary, so that life-threatening systemic vasculitis neuropathy can be diagnosed early.

[Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease with unilateral onset: clinical profile and neuroimaging]. / Enfermedad de Creutzfeldt-Jakob de inicio unilateral: clínica y neuroimagen.

The usual clinical profile of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) is that of subacute dementia and intractable myoclonus. Occasionally, some cases present peculiar clinical features. We report on a case of CJD with an unilateral onset showing remarkable neuroimaging features. The patient, aged 72 years, began to suffer from sudden anomia, initially restricted to persons; but in a few weeks it evolved into a global aphasia, right hemiparesis, severe gait disorder, and finally akinetic mutism and intractable myoclonus. He died 11 weeks after onset. Early in the course, an analysis of 14-3-3 protein in CSF was positive. In advanced disease, the EEG showed the typical periodic activity of CJD. FLAIR MRI study showed a mesencephalic and focal cortical hyperintensity. Autopsy was performed and confirmed the diagnosis of CJD with an extensive presence of generalised spongiosis in cerebral grey matter. This case illustrates the usefulness of the life recent paraclinical methods to diagnose CJD in life. New MRI techniques seems to be particularly relevant, as they are not limited to exclude other conditions but can also offer data with validity to a positive diagnosis, like grey matter hyperintensity, that in this case was present also in the midbrain.

[Descriptive study of a serie of patients affected by progressive supranuclear palsy]. / Análisis descriptivo de una serie de pacientes afectados de parálisis supranuclear progresiva.

INTRODUCTION: Progressive supranuclear palsy is a neurodegenerative disorder affecting diverse neurologic systems. The actual treatment response is poor in most patients. OBJECTIVE: review of a long series of patients affected by PSP in several aspects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A series of patients was reviewed by means of the register questionnaire of PSP in Spain (from PSP Disabling Rating Scale and Staging System). This is carried out on the patients when the diagnostic is done. It was achieved a descriptive of the patients, in several aspects, and an evaluation of the treatment in relation to the dose and the duration. RESULTS: In general, the age of diagnostic is 66 years, there is not neurological illness in the family, falls and disorders of gait are the most representative parameters. The neuroimage shows fronto temporal atrophy. The treatment response is poor, despite the dose and the duration. CONCLUSIONS: Our series confirms the typical dates of the illness an the poor response to treatment with L Dopa.

[Neuroimaging study with morphometric analysis of hereditary and idiopathic ataxia]. / Estudio de neuroimagen con análisis morfométrico de lasataxias hereditarias e idiopáticas.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary and idiopathic ataxias are neurodegenerative disorders affecting diverse neuronal systems, particularly the cerebellum and its tracts. They are currently classified according to clinical and genetic criteria. Neuroimaging is a useful tool to help diagnosis but studies using quantitative methodology are scarce. OBJECTIVE: To apply digital morphometry to cerebral MRI and define objective patterns for clinical evaluation and follow up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was carried out on 48 patients of whom 17 were Friedreich ataxia (FA), 6 non-Friedreich early onset spinocerebellar ataxia (EOCA), 9 autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxia type 1 (ADCA 1), 7 ADCA 3 and 9 idiopathic late onset cerebellar ataxia (ILOCA); 35 controls were grouped on early (< 30 years-old) and late age. Morphometric measures were done on previously selected MRI planes by image analyser digital software. RESULTS: Six out of 21 measurements and 3 ratios were significantly discriminant. By categories, the structures mainly involved were as follows: atrophy of cervical spinal cord (p = 0.001), cerebellum (p = 0.038) and protuberance (p = 0.002) in FA; atrophy of spinal cord (p = 0.009), cerebellum (p = 0.035) and widening of IV ventricle (p = 0.044) in EOCA; shrinkage of protuberance (p = 0.009), middle cerebellar peduncles (p = 0.004) and spinal cord atrophy (p = 0.001) in ADCA 1; cerebellar atrophy (p = 0.041) in ADCA 3; and cerebellar atrophy (p = 0.041) and shortening of middle cerebellar peduncles (p = 0.038) in ILOCA. CONCLUSIONS: This quantitative morphometric study confirms the existence of different pattern of cerebral involvement that is closely related with the distints clinical forms of hereditary and idiopathic ataxias. Only a few measurements can be used to obtain a morphometric profile for diagnostic and follow up purposes.